Govern
Cybersecurity strategy, roles, policy, oversight, risk management, supply chain, and executive accountability.
Evaluate your current cybersecurity posture against NIST CSF outcomes, identify material gaps, define a target state, and translate the assessment into risk-based remediation priorities that leadership can act on.
Cybersecurity strategy, roles, policy, oversight, risk management, supply chain, and executive accountability.
Assets, business environment, risk assessment, vulnerabilities, dependencies, and improvement priorities.
Identity, access, data security, awareness, platform security, resilience, and protective safeguards.
Monitoring, detection processes, event analysis, security visibility, and detection effectiveness.
Incident management, analysis, communication, mitigation, coordination, and lessons learned.
Recovery planning, restoration, business continuity, communication, and post-event improvement.
Define business units, systems, stakeholders, and objectives.
Review policies, configurations, reports, architecture, and operating records.
Evaluate current outcomes and supporting controls.
Rank gaps using risk, impact, likelihood, and dependency.
Define target state, owners, sequencing, and milestones.
Deliver executive findings and measurable next actions.
A structured view of current NIST CSF outcomes, strengths, and material weaknesses.
Findings organized by risk, business impact, severity, ownership, and remediation urgency.
Recommended improvements, sequencing, owners, milestones, dependencies, and evidence expectations.
A concise leadership view of cyber risk, maturity, key decisions, and recommended investment priorities.
NIST CSF can be used as the executive risk and governance structure while existing control frameworks provide implementation detail and evidence. We can map overlapping requirements to reduce duplicate work.
A NIST CSF assessment evaluates how well an organization currently achieves the cybersecurity outcomes described by the framework and identifies gaps, risks, and target-state priorities.
Not necessarily. A NIST CSF assessment is typically used to understand cybersecurity posture, maturity, and risk. It can support assurance activities, but its primary purpose is often improvement and prioritization.
Yes. NIST CSF can provide the governance and risk structure while CIS Controls can provide prioritized implementation safeguards.
The organization should prioritize material gaps, assign owners, establish target-state outcomes, create a remediation roadmap, track evidence, and report progress to leadership.
Translate NIST CSF outcomes into prioritized remediation, ownership, evidence, and executive visibility.
A NIST CSF 2.0 assessment reviews current cybersecurity practices against the framework, identifies gaps, establishes priorities, and helps define a target state and improvement roadmap.
No. NIST CSF can be adapted to organizations of different sizes and maturity levels, with scope and depth matched to business risk and available resources.
Yes. Synapse Cyber focuses on translating framework gaps into prioritized remediation actions and executive-level next steps rather than producing only a checklist.