AI inventory & ownership
Document AI tools, models, vendors, business use cases, data types, users, and accountable owners.
Visibility • Ownership • ClassificationEstablish clear ownership, acceptable-use policy, AI inventory, risk review, human oversight, vendor controls, evidence, and continuous monitoring without turning governance into unnecessary bureaucracy.
Practical governance designed around how your organization actually uses AI.
Risk-based decisions so higher-risk use cases receive stronger controls.
Executive visibility with ownership, evidence, risk acceptance, and measurable actions.
AI governance should connect policy and accountability to real AI use cases, risk decisions, data handling, third parties, security controls, and ongoing oversight.
Document AI tools, models, vendors, business use cases, data types, users, and accountable owners.
Visibility • Ownership • ClassificationDefine approved uses, restricted uses, prohibited data, exception handling, and employee responsibilities.
Policy • Standards • ExceptionsEvaluate privacy, security, legal, model, vendor, operational, reputational, and decision-impact risks.
Risk scoring • Review • TreatmentDefine when AI outputs require human review, approval, challenge, or escalation before action.
Human-in-the-loop • Approval • EscalationApply due diligence to third-party AI, contracts, data usage, retention, model training, and subprocessors.
Third party • Data • Contract controlsTrack incidents, exceptions, use-case changes, control evidence, review dates, and governance metrics.
Evidence • Metrics • Continuous reviewWe help you build the program in practical stages so governance grows with your AI adoption.
Identify current AI use, stakeholders, business drivers, and existing controls.
Group AI use cases by risk, impact, data sensitivity, and governance requirements.
Define governance roles, policy, review workflows, evidence, and control expectations.
Operationalize approvals, risk assessment, vendor review, human oversight, and documentation.
Measure exceptions, incidents, changes, overdue reviews, and governance performance.
Your program can be structured around recognized AI governance principles while remaining practical for your size, risk profile, customers, and regulatory environment.
Ownership, accountability, policy, roles, risk appetite, and oversight.
MAPContext, use cases, affected stakeholders, dependencies, and business impact.
MEASURERisk assessment, evidence, control performance, monitoring, and metrics.
MANAGERisk treatment, approvals, remediation, exceptions, and continuous improvement.
Synapse Cyber helps organizations move from policies and framework language to a practical governance program with ownership, risk decisions, approvals, evidence, and recurring oversight.
Define decision rights, accountable owners, governance committees, escalation, and executive oversight.
Establish a repeatable inventory and classify AI use cases by impact, data sensitivity, autonomy, and business risk.
Set acceptable-use requirements, approval thresholds, human review, exception handling, and documentation standards.
Define evidence, review cadence, metrics, incidents, changes, and continual governance improvement.
Complete the 10-question readiness checker to get a 0–100 score, maturity level, strongest areas, priority gaps, and recommended next actions.
Clear purpose, scope, accountability, decision rights, and escalation paths.
A structured way to record AI use cases, tools, vendors, owners, and data exposure.
A repeatable process to classify, assess, approve, reject, or remediate AI use.
Acceptable use, data handling, third-party, human oversight, and documentation expectations.
Evidence requirements that support internal governance, customer assurance, and audits.
Prioritized actions with owners, timing, and measurable governance outcomes.
A practical program typically covers ownership, acceptable use, AI inventory, risk assessment, data handling, third-party AI, human oversight, incident response, monitoring, and periodic review.
Yes. Commercial AI can still create privacy, security, legal, data, vendor, and decision-making risks even when you are not building your own models.
Yes. The program can align with NIST AI RMF while being adapted to your organization’s size, business model, risk profile, and existing cybersecurity or compliance program.
AI security focuses on protecting systems, models, data, and integrations. AI governance is broader and also addresses accountability, policy, acceptable use, oversight, risk ownership, vendor governance, and lifecycle controls.
We can help you start with a readiness review or design the complete governance program.
Assess identity, data protection, prompt security, vendor risk, integrations, human oversight, logging, incident response, and monitoring.